Civicord · UK · Browse / Woking

Woking · E14001592 · South East · England · 71,737 electorate

Woking

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 3 of 4 sites responding (75%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 4 candidate websites for Woking.

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 redirected, 2 answered, 1 with another HTTP result. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Nataly Suzana Anderson — https://about.me/natalyandersonmarinovic — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Will Forster — https://www.willforster.co.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Jonathan Lord — http://www.jonathanlord.co.uk — Audit result: Timed out.
    • Ese Erheriene — https://eseerheriene.co.uk — Redirected to https://eseerheriene.wordpress.com/.
  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 4 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Will Forster — 218 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.willforster.co.uk. Example from the April text: “"I wanted to push for peace, and I wanted to see how both myself and the UK can help to achieve this." Will signs letter to support private and voluntary…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 3 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Woking — 3 of 4 sites responding (75%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 4 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/woking.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/woking

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="woking")
-> { name: "Woking", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p92284.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "92284") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close