Civicord · UK · Browse / Tynemouth

Tynemouth · E14001557 · North East · England · 73,022 electorate

Tynemouth

Mixed HTTP results — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was between 40% and 65%. Inspect each URL for its result. 2 of 4 sites responding (50%) · 1 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 5 candidate websites for Tynemouth.

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 2 no longer resolved, 1 redirected, 2 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Christopher Greener — https://christophergreenertynemouthgeneralelection2024.org — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • John Christopher Appleby — https://johnapplebyld.wordpress.com — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Matt Williams — https://www.matt4nclew.co.uk — No longer resolved (DNS failure). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.
    • Mustaque Rahman — https://www.rahman4pcc.org — No longer resolved (DNS failure). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.
    • Alan Campbell — http://www.alancampbellmp.co.uk — Redirected to https://www.alancampbellmp.co.uk/.
  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 5 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • John Christopher Appleby — 1750 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://johnapplebyld.wordpress.com. Example from the April text: “In 2019, many Conservative MPs, most Conservative members, and then sufficient voters, thought that Johnson, for all his known faults, would do a good enough…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 4 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Tynemouth — 2 of 4 sites responding (50%) · 1 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 4 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/tynemouth.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/tynemouth

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="tynemouth")
-> { name: "Tynemouth", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p2910.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "2910") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close