James Naish · Labour Party
- HTTP 404
Rushcliffe
- E14001457
- East Midlands
- 2 candidates
- 2 sites
Mixed HTTP results — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was between 40% and 65%. Inspect each URL for its result. 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirected
What happened here
What was recorded
The April 2025 scrape recorded 2 candidate websites for Rushcliffe.
- James Naish — Labour Party — https://www.jamesnaish.com/james-for-rushcliffe
- Ruth Edwards — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.ruthedwards.org.uk
What the audit found
On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 redirected, 1 with another HTTP result. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.
- James Naish — https://www.jamesnaish.com/james-for-rushcliffe — Audit result: HTTP error (HTTP 404).
- Ruth Edwards — https://www.ruthedwards.org.uk — Redirected to http://www.ruthedwards.co.uk/.
What happened to the words
A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 2 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.
- Ruth Edwards — 1 sentence from the April text was not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.ruthedwards.org.uk. Example from the April text: “Skip to content Menu Menu Under construction 11 October 2024 by administrator”
No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 1 candidate on this seat has no sentence comparison in the snapshot.
Halftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.
Candidates in this seat
Ruth Edwards · Conservative and Unionist Party
- HTTP 200
- ↳ Redirect destination at audit: http://www.ruthedwards.co.uk/
- Candidate-name signal: surname matched in the response body (heuristic only)
This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →