Civicord · UK · Browse / Newcastle upon Tyne North

Newcastle upon Tyne North · E14001379 · North East · England · 76,503 electorate

Newcastle upon Tyne North

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 3 of 4 sites responding (75%) · 0 unreachable · 2 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 4 candidate websites for Newcastle upon Tyne North.

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 2 redirected, 1 answered, 1 with another HTTP result. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • King Teare — https://www.inter-acting.co.uk/kingteare.html — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Catherine McKinnell — http://www.catherinemckinnell.co.uk — Audit result: HTTP error (HTTP 403).
    • Guy Renner-Thompson — https://www.guyrennerthompson.uk — Redirected to https://www.conservatives.com/. The surname was not in the response body.
    • Martin Paul Evison — https://sdp.org.uk — Redirected to https://www.sdp.org.uk. The surname was not in the response body.

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 4 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Guy Renner-Thompson — 601 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.guyrennerthompson.uk. Example from the April text: “The post, initially covered by the Daily Mail is available here: Rail union bosses spark fury by enjoying Christmas 'bash' with Labour MPs while wrecking…”

  4. Text overlap, where it was scored

    A separate Wayback comparison scored text overlap for some candidates. It kept the score and an archive URL.

    • Guy Renner-Thompson — Substantial text difference from the compared archived page against the 10 April 2025 archive. 21% of April tokens were still found. Sentence text for this comparison is absent from the snapshot. · Open the archive

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 3 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Newcastle upon Tyne North — 3 of 4 sites responding (75%) · 0 unreachable · 2 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 4 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/newcastle-upon-tyne-north.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/newcastle-upon-tyne-north

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="newcastle-upon-tyne-north")
-> { name: "Newcastle upon Tyne North", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p2098.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "2098") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close