Civicord · UK · Browse / Morecambe and Lunesdale

Morecambe and Lunesdale · E14001372 · North West · England · 76,040 electorate

Morecambe and Lunesdale

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 2 of 3 sites responding (67%) · 0 unreachable · 0 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 3 candidate websites for Morecambe and Lunesdale.

    • David Morris — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.davidmorris.org.uk
    • Gina Dowding — Green Party — https://ginadowding.org.uk
    • Lizzi Collinge — Labour Party — https://www.lizzicollinge.com

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 2 answered, 1 with another HTTP result. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • David Morris — https://www.davidmorris.org.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Lizzi Collinge — https://www.lizzicollinge.com — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Gina Dowding — https://ginadowding.org.uk — Audit result: HTTP error (HTTP 500).

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 3 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • David Morris — 250 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.davidmorris.org.uk. Example from the April text: “In the official Observation to Petition P002899 Morecambe Town Council, Petition of residents of the United Kingdom, David Morris MP, DLUHC, observation…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 2 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Morecambe and Lunesdale — 2 of 3 sites responding (67%) · 0 unreachable · 0 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 3 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/morecambe-and-lunesdale.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/morecambe-and-lunesdale

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="morecambe-and-lunesdale")
-> { name: "Morecambe and Lunesdale", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p2424.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "2424") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close