Civicord · UK · Browse / Milton Keynes Central

Milton Keynes Central · E14001369 · South East · England · 76,708 electorate

Milton Keynes Central

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 3 of 3 sites responding (100%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 3 candidate websites for Milton Keynes Central.

    • Emily Darlington — Labour Party — https://emily4mk.com
    • James Cox — Liberal Democrats — https://www.mklibdems.co.uk/james-cox
    • Johnny Luk — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.johnnyluk.co.uk
  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 redirected, 2 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Emily Darlington — https://emily4mk.com — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • James Cox — https://www.mklibdems.co.uk/james-cox — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Johnny Luk — https://www.johnnyluk.co.uk — Redirected to https://www.conservatives.com/. The surname was not in the response body.
  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 2 of the 3 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Emily Darlington — 2 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://emily4mk.com. Example from the April text: “Welcome YOUR MILTON KEYNES CENTRAL MP My Pledge Write To Me If you need help or want to share your views, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with me here.”
    • Johnny Luk — 3 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.johnnyluk.co.uk. Example from the April text: “These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 1 candidate on this seat has no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Milton Keynes Central — 3 of 3 sites responding (100%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 3 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/milton-keynes-central.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/milton-keynes-central

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="milton-keynes-central")
-> { name: "Milton Keynes Central", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p4382.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "4382") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close