Civicord · UK · Browse / Luton South and South Bedfordshire

Luton South and South Bedfordshire · E14001346 · East of England · England · 70,197 electorate

Luton South and South Bedfordshire

Mixed HTTP results — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was between 40% and 65%. Inspect each URL for its result. 2 of 4 sites responding (50%) · 1 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 4 candidate websites for Luton South and South Bedfordshire.

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 no longer resolved, 1 redirected, 2 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Attiq Ahmed Malik — https://lutonindependent.co.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Norman MacLean — https://www.normanmaclean.co.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Mark Anthony Gaius Versallion — http://versallion.com/Mark/MARK.htm — No longer resolved (Connection failed). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.
    • Rachel Hopkins — http://www.rachelhopkins.org — Redirected to https://www.rachelhopkins.org/.

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 4 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Norman MacLean — 1 sentence from the April text was not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.normanmaclean.co.uk. Example from the April text: “Please visit https://donate.reformparty.uk/luton-south-south-bedfordshire if you wish to contribute towards the future campaigning for the Luton South & South…”

  4. Text overlap, where it was scored

    A separate Wayback comparison scored text overlap for some candidates. It kept the score and an archive URL.

    • Mark Anthony Gaius Versallion — Small text difference from the compared archived page against the 29 September 2017 archive. 41% of April tokens were still found. The capture sits outside the April 2025 scrape window. Sentence text for this comparison is absent from the snapshot. · Open the archive

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 3 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Luton South and South Bedfordshire — 2 of 4 sites responding (50%) · 1 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 4 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/luton-south-and-south-bedfordshire.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/luton-south-and-south-bedfordshire

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="luton-south-and-south-bedfordshire")
-> { name: "Luton South and South Bedfordshire", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p7417.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "7417") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close