Civicord · UK · Browse / Hove and Portslade

Hove and Portslade · E14001296 · South East · England · 73,726 electorate

Hove and Portslade

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 2 of 3 sites responding (67%) · 1 unreachable · 0 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 3 candidate websites for Hove and Portslade.

    • Michael Wang — Liberal Democrats — https://michaelwang.co.uk
    • Peter Kyle — Labour Party — http://www.peterkyle.co.uk
    • Tanushka Marah — Independent — https://tanushkamarah.com

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 no longer resolved, 2 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Peter Kyle — http://www.peterkyle.co.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Tanushka Marah — https://tanushkamarah.com — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Michael Wang — https://michaelwang.co.uk — No longer resolved (Connection failed). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 3 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Tanushka Marah — 150 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://tanushkamarah.com. Example from the April text: “Restore NHS funding through taxing the super rich and offshore billions • Catch up funding to make up for Tory underfunding and put it in line with other…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 2 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Hove and Portslade — 2 of 3 sites responding (67%) · 1 unreachable · 0 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 3 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/hove-and-portslade.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/hove-and-portslade

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="hove-and-portslade")
-> { name: "Hove and Portslade", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p116325.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "116325") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close