Civicord · UK · Browse / Honiton and Sidmouth

Honiton and Sidmouth · E14001291 · South West · England · 74,365 electorate

Honiton and Sidmouth

Mixed HTTP results — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was between 40% and 65%. Inspect each URL for its result. 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 2 candidate websites for Honiton and Sidmouth.

    • Richard Foord — Liberal Democrats — https://www.richardfoord.org.uk
    • Simon Jupp — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.simonjupp.org.uk
  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 redirected, 1 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Richard Foord — https://www.richardfoord.org.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Simon Jupp — https://www.simonjupp.org.uk — Redirected to https://members.parliament.uk/member/4862/career.
  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 2 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Richard Foord — 1608 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.richardfoord.org.uk. Example from the April text: “‘Neighbourhood health centres’ must feature Eastern Devon’s community hospitals Five community hospitals across the Honiton & Sidmouth constituency There are…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 1 candidate on this seat has no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Honiton and Sidmouth — 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 2 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/honiton-and-sidmouth.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/honiton-and-sidmouth

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="honiton-and-sidmouth")
-> { name: "Honiton and Sidmouth", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p35051.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "35051") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close