Civicord · UK · Browse / Blyth and Ashington

Blyth and Ashington · E14001107 · North East · England · 75,452 electorate

Blyth and Ashington

Low response rate — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was below 40%. Technical failures do not establish permanent removal. 1 of 3 sites responding (33%) · 2 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 3 candidate websites for Blyth and Ashington.

    • Ian Lavery — Labour Party — https://www.ianlavery.co.uk
    • Mark Peart — Reform UK — https://brexitblyth.co.uk
    • Maureen Levy — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.maureenlevy.uk

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 2 no longer resolved, 1 redirected. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Ian Lavery — https://www.ianlavery.co.uk — No longer resolved (Connection failed). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.
    • Mark Peart — https://brexitblyth.co.uk — No longer resolved (Connection failed). An outage and a removal look the same in this check.
    • Maureen Levy — https://www.maureenlevy.uk — Redirected to https://www.conservatives.com/. The surname was not in the response body.

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 3 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Maureen Levy — 3 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.maureenlevy.uk. Example from the April text: “These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.”

  4. Text overlap, where it was scored

    A separate Wayback comparison scored text overlap for some candidates. It kept the score and an archive URL.

    • Maureen Levy — Substantial text difference from the compared archived page against the 9 February 2025 archive. 27% of April tokens were still found. The capture sits outside the April 2025 scrape window. Sentence text for this comparison is absent from the snapshot. · Open the archive

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 2 candidates on this seat have no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Blyth and Ashington — 1 of 3 sites responding (33%) · 2 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 3 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/blyth-and-ashington.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/blyth-and-ashington

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="blyth-and-ashington")
-> { name: "Blyth and Ashington", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p3057.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "3057") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close