Civicord · UK · Browse / Bath

Bath · E14001080 · South West · England · 73,241 electorate

Bath

Mostly responding — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was at least 66%. This does not establish that campaign content survived. 3 of 3 sites responding (100%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 3 candidate websites for Bath.

    • Dom Tristram — Green Party — https://dominictristram.com
    • James Wright — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://www.james-wright.org.uk
    • Wera Hobhouse — Liberal Democrats — https://www.werahobhouse.co.uk
  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 1 redirected, 2 answered. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Dom Tristram — https://dominictristram.com — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • James Wright — https://www.james-wright.org.uk — Answered (HTTP 200).
    • Wera Hobhouse — https://www.werahobhouse.co.uk — Redirected to https://werahobhouse.org.uk/.
  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 3 of the 3 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Dom Tristram — 4181 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://dominictristram.com. Example from the April text: “I think it’s worth just dwelling on the fact that many of the people who voted for Brexit did so because they didn’t like the idea of migration and how they…”
    • James Wright — 476 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.james-wright.org.uk. Example from the April text: “This document outlines how James Wright processes and manages personal data and: • Identifies the data controller. • Explains the lawful basis for processing…”
    • Wera Hobhouse — 14 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://www.werahobhouse.co.uk. Example from the April text: “Wera Hobhouse praises “valuable” work of local training provider 12 July 2024 On Friday 12th July, Wera Hobhouse, in her first Bath visit following her…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own.

Bath — 3 of 3 sites responding (100%) · 0 unreachable · 1 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 3 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/bath.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/bath

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="bath")
-> { name: "Bath", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p4707.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "4707") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close