Civicord · UK · Browse / Amber Valley

Amber Valley · E14001066 · East Midlands · England · 70,625 electorate

Amber Valley

Mixed HTTP results — The rounded HTTP response rate at the audit was between 40% and 65%. Inspect each URL for its result. 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 0 unreachable · 2 redirected

What happened here

  1. What was recorded

    The April 2025 scrape recorded 2 candidate websites for Amber Valley.

    • Linsey Farnsworth — Labour Party — https://linseyfarnsworth.co.uk
    • Nigel Mills — Conservative and Unionist Party — https://nigelmillsmp.com

  2. What the audit found

    On 7 September 2026 those URLs were requested again — 2 redirected. An HTTP success means the server answered. It does not establish that the campaign page survived.

    • Linsey Farnsworth — https://linseyfarnsworth.co.uk — Redirected to https://www.linseyfarnsworth.co.uk/.
    • Nigel Mills — https://nigelmillsmp.com — Redirected to https://pengeluaranhongkong.info/. The surname was not in the response body.

  3. What happened to the words

    A homepage fetch was compared with the April site text for 1 of the 2 candidates here. A sentence missing from that fetch is not matched to a replacement.

    • Nigel Mills — 20 sentences from the April text were not found on the homepage fetch of https://nigelmillsmp.com. Example from the April text: “Togel HK Pools: Nomor Pengeluaran HK, Keluaran HK Hari Ini, Data HK Prize, Result HK Terbaru Togel HK Pools adalah salah satu bentuk permainan angka keluaran…”

No replacement sentence is matched. A line that only appears on the later homepage is listed on its own. 1 candidate on this seat has no sentence comparison in the snapshot.

Amber Valley — 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 0 unreachable · 2 redirectedHalftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

Candidates in this seat

Open filtered ledger — 2 sites ↗See what you followBrowse all 2,375 ↗UK overview ←

This link encodes the seat view · Press ⌘K to jump anywhere. This seat's hex is equal-weight (Automatic Knowledge v5, OGL) · How we checked →

Agent viewInspect the data and verify the record$0.002 / seat

Humans read this page for free. Agents pay per jurisdiction — this exact record is one metered call. Everything below is live; nothing here is mocked.

1 Free, same-origin

/api/constituencies/amber-valley.json

Plain static JSON, CORS *, no key, 5-minute cache.

2 Metered via x402

https://civicord-aieyq.bazgateway.com/api/constituencies/amber-valley

One jurisdiction = one charge. Expect 402, not an error.

3 MCP tool

Same call, as an agent would invoke it over MCP.

getConstituency(slug="amber-valley")
-> { name: "Amber Valley", stats: { sites, live, livePct, ... }, candidates: [ ... ] }

4 The Graph (live)

On-chain p95581.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

{
  candidate(id: "95581") {
    id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
    registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
  }
  _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
}

Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close