Civicord · UK · Browse / Liberal Democrats / Goole and Pocklington / Dale Richard Needham

Campaign site for Dale Richard Needham (Liberal Democrats — Goole and Pocklington), scraped April 2025, audited September 2026.

Dale Richard Needham

View evidencePropose a correctionIs this your record? Claim itReply if this is wrongMore change stories ↗See what you followQuery The Graph

Snapshot audit, not a current availability check. HTTP success and surname matches do not prove campaign content survived. On-chain fields are on Sepolia testnet; full content is not stored on-chain.

URLs responding — Dale Richard Needham's recorded URLs returned successful HTTP responses at the 2026-09-07 audit. This does not establish that campaign content survived.

Liberal Democrats: 70% responding across the party · this candidate: responding.See the cohort ↗

Stood in Goole and Pocklington — 2 of 2 sites responding (100%) · 0 unreachable · 0 redirected

E14001250 · Yorkshire and the Humber · England · 76,337 electorate · Halftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

  1. Apr 2025scraped
  2. Sep 2026audited
  3. PendingSepolia

Propose a correction

If a URL, name, or sentence on this record is wrong, send a sourced request. It is queued for a person to review. It does not change the audit, the April scrape, the sentence comparison, or the Sepolia record.What is verified, and what is not.

Review queue

Requests stored for this record. A request is not an edit.

    Is this your record?

    If you are Dale Richard Needham or work on their campaign, you can claim this record. Say how a reviewer could verify it — a campaign-domain email, a link on the live site, or your Democracy Club profile. A claim is queued for a person to check; it grants no edit access and changes nothing until verified.

    Content chronology

    minorSmall text difference from the compared archived page · 41% of April tokens still found

    Websites

    Respondinghttps://www.eastridinglibdems.org.uk

    What changedSurname absent from the response body — a weak signal that needs review

    • HTTP result: Responding (HTTP 200) at the 2026-09-07 audit
    • Candidate-name signal: surname not found in the response body (heuristic only)

    Source evidence and excerpts

    These are short excerpts from the April 2025 scrape, not the later wording and not complete archived pages. Original filenames identify the stored extracts. Browse the Campaign Lab source dataset ↗

    Open the compared Wayback capture ↗

    Scrape excerpts — April 2025 · 8 shown
    PageCharsOpening excerpt
    content_12.html22,862
    This policy was last updated on the 2nd May 2018
    The Liberal Democrats (“the Party”) respect individuals’ rights over th…
    content_13.html2,874
    What we stand for
    The Liberal Democrats exist to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to …
    content_14.html1,908
    Free To Be Who You Are
    As liberals, we believe that true equality is achieved when individuals are not only free from pr…
    content_3.html1,597
    Taking on Trump & Farage – and fixing church roofs
    Leader's Speech to Spring Conference 2025
    Following on from our excel…
    content_9.html1,569
    East Riding Liberal Democrats are calling on Ofcom to intervene in the row over telegraph poles
    Growing concern about te…
    content_10.html1,549
    Liberal Democrats force action on fly tipping
    Cllr. Phil Redshaw (LibDem, Cottingham North) has welcomed the decision by…
    content_11.html1,455
    Britain must lead on defence and aid
    The UK needs to strengthen both our Armed Forces and our soft power.
    Following on f…
    content_7.html1,432
    Overtaking the Conservatives
    Local Election Results Briefing: Our best ever winning streak
    Following on from our excelle…
    Agent viewInspect the data and verify the recordGraph live

    The audit ledger above is a static snapshot. The buttons below run live queries against The Graph and the ledger JSON — only when you click them. Nothing fetches automatically and nothing here is mocked.

    1 Free ledger JSON

    /api/candidates/62302.json

    Static audit record — websites, status, ENS hint.

    2 WebMCP join

    Preferred agent tool — live Graph + ledger verdict.

    compare_onchain_to_ledger(id="62302")
    -> { onchain, ledger, verdict[] }

    3 The Graph (live)

    On-chain p62302.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

    {
      candidate(id: "62302") {
        id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
        registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
      }
      _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
    }

    Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

    Jurisdiction

    Reading…

    Reading the public record…

    Reading /api/… — the same static JSON an agent pays for.

    ↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close