Civicord · UK · Browse / Labour Party / Chatham and Aylesford / Tris Osborne

Campaign site for Tris Osborne (Labour Party — Chatham and Aylesford), scraped April 2025, audited September 2026.

Tris Osborne

View evidenceBefore and afterPropose a correctionIs this your record? Claim itReply if this is wrongMore change stories ↗See what you followQuery The Graph

Snapshot audit, not a current availability check. HTTP success and surname matches do not prove campaign content survived. On-chain fields are on Sepolia testnet; full content is not stored on-chain.

URLs responding — Tris Osborne's recorded URLs returned successful HTTP responses at the 2026-09-07 audit. This does not establish that campaign content survived.

Labour Party: 61% responding across the party · this candidate: responding.See the cohort ↗

Stood in Chatham and Aylesford — 1 of 2 sites responding (50%) · 1 unreachable · 1 redirected

E14001157 · South East · England · 74,840 electorate · Halftone: more / larger paper dots = lower response rate.

  1. Apr 2025scraped
  2. Sep 2026audited
  3. PendingSepolia

Before and after

April site-wide text vs the 2026-09-21 homepage fetch of https://trisosborne.com: 5 sentences still present, 2 no longer found, 8 new. These are candidates for review, not proof a sentence was withdrawn.The April text covers the whole scraped site; the later text is one homepage fetch. A sentence can be missing from that homepage and still exist on another page. A missing sentence is not matched to a replacement.

Before · April 2025

Subscribe to my email newsletter to keep updated on my news, campaigns and work in Chatham and Aylesford.

After · 21 September 2026

Not found on the homepage fetch.

https://trisosborne.com

Gap: no replacement sentence is matched. The April text covers the whole scraped site; the later text is one homepage fetch. A sentence can be missing from that homepage and still exist on another page.

Before · April 2025

By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and Privacy Policy.

After · 21 September 2026

Not found on the homepage fetch.

https://trisosborne.com

Gap: no replacement sentence is matched. The April text covers the whole scraped site; the later text is one homepage fetch. A sentence can be missing from that homepage and still exist on another page.

New on the later homepage, not matched to a removed sentence

Propose a correction

If a URL, name, or sentence on this record is wrong, send a sourced request. It is queued for a person to review. It does not change the audit, the April scrape, the sentence comparison, or the Sepolia record.What is verified, and what is not.

Review queue

Requests stored for this record. A request is not an edit.

    Is this your record?

    If you are Tris Osborne or work on their campaign, you can claim this record. Say how a reviewer could verify it — a campaign-domain email, a link on the live site, or your Democracy Club profile. A claim is queued for a person to check; it grants no edit access and changes nothing until verified.

    Websites

    Respondinghttps://trisosborne.com

    What changedURL redirected at the audit

    • HTTP result: Responding (HTTP 200) at the 2026-09-07 audit
    • ↳ Redirect destination at audit: https://www.trisosborne.com/
    • Candidate-name signal: surname matched in the response body (heuristic only)

    Source evidence and excerpts

    These are short excerpts from the April 2025 scrape, not the later wording and not complete archived pages. Original filenames identify the stored extracts. Browse the Campaign Lab source dataset ↗

    Scrape excerpts — April 2025 · 1 shown
    PageCharsOpening excerpt
    content_1.html902
    Subscribe to my email newsletter to keep updated on my news, campaigns and work in Chatham and Aylesford.
    Subscribe
    I ag…
    Agent viewInspect the data and verify the recordGraph live

    The audit ledger above is a static snapshot. The buttons below run live queries against The Graph and the ledger JSON — only when you click them. Nothing fetches automatically and nothing here is mocked.

    1 Free ledger JSON

    /api/candidates/4304.json

    Static audit record — websites, status, ENS hint.

    2 WebMCP join

    Preferred agent tool — live Graph + ledger verdict.

    compare_onchain_to_ledger(id="4304")
    -> { onchain, ledger, verdict[] }

    3 The Graph (live)

    On-chain p4304.civicord.eth via/api/graph (Studio proxy) — person id, not seat slug.

    {
      candidate(id: "4304") {
        id ensName status url personName textRecordCount
        registeredAt registeredAtBlock owner
      }
      _meta { block { number } hasIndexingErrors }
    }

    Live queries run on demand; a failure is shown honestly, never replaced with a cached response. Verify independently: ENS ·resolver ·Subgraph Studio ·/api/graph ·openapi.yaml ·source

    Jurisdiction

    Reading…

    Reading the public record…

    Reading /api/… — the same static JSON an agent pays for.

    ↑↓ move · ↵ open · Esc close